Palabras clave
nivel de adopción de tecnología
grandes emmpresas
países con diferentes perfiles industriales
fsQCA
Cómo citar
Resumen
El proceso de transición hacia la Industria 4.0 implica una serie de adecuaciones en las empresas centradas en la automatización, la conectividad y la información digital, lo que supone la selección de tecnologías que le permitan tener un proceso más acertado y mejore su desempeño (Ciulli, 2019; Prause, 2019). Este artículo tiene el objetivo de identificar las tecnologías necesarias que deben de tomar en cuenta las grandes empresas de países con diferentes perfiles industriales para alcanzar un alto nivel de adopción de tecnología y tener éxito en la dinámica de transición hacia la Industria 4.0. El marco de Tecnología, Organización y Medio Ambiente (TOE, por sus siglas en inglés) sirve como referencia teórica en este estudio (Tornatzky y Fleischer, 1990). La metodología utilizada es el Análisis Cualitativo Comparado en su variante fuzzy-set (fsQCA, por sus siglas en inglés). Los resultados muestran que las tecnologías como el Cloud Computing (CC), el Cifrado y Ciberseguridad (CCS), el Análisis de Big Data (ABD), la Inteligencia Artificial (IA), el Procesamiento de Imagen y Voz de Texto (PIVT) y el Comercio Electrónico y Comercio Digital (CECD) son necesarias para que las grandes empresas de los países analizados puedan alcanzar un alto nivel de adopción de tecnología.
Citas
Carr, V. (1999). Technology Adoption and Diffusion (Working Paper). https://www.tudocu.com/row/document/tribhuvan-vishwavidalaya/information-technology/read-article-technology-adoption-and-diffusion/23015343
Ciulli, E. (2019). Tribology and Industry: From the Origins to 4.0. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 5, 1-12. Https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2019.00055
De Jesus, C. & Lima, R. (2020). Literature Search of Key Factors for the Development of Generic and Specific Maturity Models for Industry 4.0. Applied Sciences, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175825
Depietro, R., Wiarda, E. & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Context for Change: Organization, Technology and Environment. En L. Tornatzky et al. (Eds.), The Processes of Technological Innovation (pp. 151-175). Lexington Books.
Federo, R. (2019). Qualitative Comparative Analysis. En F. Badache et al. (Eds.), Introduction to International Organization Research Methods. Forthcoming. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3463000
Fiss, P. (2011). Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Foerstl, K., Schleper, M. & Henke, M. (2017). Purchasing and Supply Management: From Efficiency to Effectiveness in an Integrated Supply Chain. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(4), 223-228. httpp://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.08.004
Glas, A. & Kleemann, F. (2016). The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Procurement and Supply Management: A Conceptual and Qualitative Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(6), 55-66.
Gottge, S., Menzel, T. & Forslund, H. (2020). Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Purchasing Process. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(4), 730-748. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2019-0304
Hofmann, C. & Orr, S. (2005). Advanced Manufacturing Technology Adoption-The German Experience. Technovation, 25(7), 711-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.12.002
Jacobsson, M. & Linderoth, H. (2010). The Influence of Contextual Elements, Actors’ Frames of Reference, and Technology on the Adoption and Use of ICT in Construction Projects: A Swedish Case Study. Construction Management and Economics, 28(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903406154
Kagermann, H., Lukas, W.-D. & Wahlster, W. (2011, abril 1). Industrie 4.0: Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. Industriellen Revolution. Ingenieur. http://www.vdi-nachrichten.com/Technik-Gesellschaft/Industrie-40-Mit-Internet-Dinge-Weg-4-industriellen-Revolution
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. & Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Acatech.
Kotha, S. & Swamidass, P. (2000). Strategy, Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Performance: Empirical Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Operations Management, 18(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00025-X
Lee, M.-C. (2009). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking: An Integration of TAM and TPB with Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006
Lin, D., Lee, C., Lau, H. & Yang, Y. (2018). Strategic Response to Industry 4.0: An Empirical Investigation on the Chinese Automotive Industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 589-605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0403
Mohammad, N. & Shavarebi, K. (2019). A Review of Global Automotive Industry’s Competitive Strategies. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 16(4), 170-183.
Ngah, A., Thurasamy, R., Mohd, N., Jeevan, J., Hanafiah, R. & Eneizan, B. (2022). Halal Transportation Adoption Among Food Manufacturers in Malaysia: The Moderated Model of Technology, Organization and Environment (TOE) Framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-03-2020-0079
Oesterreich, T. & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the Implications of Digitisation and Automation in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Triangulation Approach and Elements of a Research Agenda for the Construction Industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.09.006
Oliveira, T. & Fraga Martins, M. (2011). Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110-121. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejise/article/view/389
Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A. & Rubera G. (2014). When the Recipe is More Important than the Ingredients a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of Service Innovation Configurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513513337
Pappas, I., Kourouthanassis, P., Giannakos, M. & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining Online Shopping Behavior with fsQCA: The Role of Cognitive and Affective Perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794-803.
Pappas, I. & Woodside, A. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fs-QCA): Guidelines for Research Practice in Information Systems and Marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
Parente, T. & Federo, R. (2019). Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Justifying a Neo-configurational Approach in Management Research. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0089
Pfohl, H., Yahsi, B. & Kurnaz, T. (2015). The Impact of Industry 4.0 in the Supply Chain. En W. Kersten et al. (Eds.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (pp. 31-58). Epubli GmbH. https://doi.org/10419/209250
Prause, M. (2019). Challenges of Industry 4.0 Technology Adoption for SMEs: The Case of Japan. Sustainability, 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205807
Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry. Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. The University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. (2003a, agosto). Making Comparative Analysis Count (Working paper). University of Arizona. https://www.compasss.org/wpseries/Ragin2003b.pdf
Ragin, C. (2003b, agosto). Recent Advances in Fuzzy-Set Methods and their Application to Policy Questions (Working paper). University of Arizona. https://www.compasss.org/wpseries/Ragin2003a.pdf
Ragin, C. (2004). Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented Research. En H. Brady y D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (pp. 123-138). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. The University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. (2005, abril). From Fuzzy Sets to Crisp Truth Tables (Working paper). University of Arizona.
Ragin, C. (2006). Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis, 14, 291-310.
Ragin C., Drass, K. & Davey, S. (2007). Usser’s Guide to Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0. University of Arizona, 23(6), 1949-1955.
Tornatzky, L., Fleisher, M. y Chakrabarti, A. (1990). The Process of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books.
Wagemann, C. (2012). ¿Qué hay de nuevo en el Método Comparado?: QCA y el análisis de los conjuntos difusos. Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública, 1(1), 51-75. https://doi.org/10.15174/remap.v1i1.4
World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future Jobs Report 2020. WEF. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/
Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M. & Gorecky, D. (2015). Towards Industry 4.0 -Standardization as the Crucial Challenge for Highly Modular, Multi-vendor Production System. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 579-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.143
Woodside, A.G. (2014). Embrace perform model: Complexity Theory, Contrarian Case Analysis, and Multiple Realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495-2503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
Yeh, C., Lee, G. & Pai, J. (2014). Using a Technology-Organization-Environment Framework to Investigate the Factors Influencing E-business Information Technology Capabilities. Information Development, 31(5), 1-16.
Zhou, K., Liu, T. & Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: Towards Future Industrial Opportunities and Challenges [Ponencia]. En 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiaji, China.
Zhu, K. & Kraemer, K. (2005). Post-adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry. Information Systems Research, Informs of Institute for Operations Research, 16(1).
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Fundación Universitaria San Mateo